Dataset for: Strivens, A., Koch, I & Lavric, A. (2024). Does Preparation Help to Switch Auditory Attention Between Simultaneous Voices: Effects of Switch Probability and Prevalence of Conflict. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02841-y

Switching auditory attention to one of two (or more) simultaneous voices incurs a substantial performance overhead. Whether/when this voice ‘switch cost’ reduces when the listener has opportunity to prepare in silence is not clear–the findings on the effect of preparation on the switch cost range from (near) null to substantial. We sought to determine which factors are crucial for encouraging preparation and detecting its effect on the switch cost in a paradigm where participants categorized the number spoken by one of two simultaneous voices; the target voice, which changed unpredictably, was specified by a visual cue depicting the target’s gender. First, we manipulated the probability of a voice switch. When 25% of trials were switches, increasing the preparation interval (50/800/1,400 ms) resulted in substantial (~50%) reduction in switch cost. No reduction was observed when 75% of trials were switches. Second, we examined the relative prevalence of low-conflict, ‘congruent’ trials (where the numbers spoken by the two voices were mapped onto the same response) and high-conflict, ‘incongruent’ trials (where the voices afforded different responses). ‘Conflict prevalence’ had a strong effect on selectivity–the incongruent–congruent difference (‘congruence effect’) was reduced in the 66%-incongruent condition relative to the 66%-congruent condition–but conflict prevalence did not discernibly interact with preparation and its effect on the switch cost. Thus, conditions where switches of target voice are relatively rare are especially conducive to preparation, possibly because attention is committed more strongly to (and/or disengaged less rapidly from) the perceptual features of target voice.